Home » AGEB Journal » Issues » Volume 82" » Fasc.3 - Original articles » Article details

Ulcerative colitis treatment : an insight into daily clinical practice

Journal Volume 82 - 2019
Issue Fasc.3 - Original articles
Author(s) P. Bossuyt, F. Baert, J.L. Coenegrachts, M. De Vos, O. Dewit, M. Ferrante, F. Fontaine, F. Mana, J. Vandervoort, T. Moreels
Full article
Full Article
VIEW FREE PDF
(1) Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda GI Clinical Research, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium ; (2) Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium ; (3) Department of Gastroenterology, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium ; (4) Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Gent, Gent, Belgium ; (5) Department of Gastroenterology, UCL Saint Luc, Brussel, Belgium ; (6) Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; (7) Department of Gastroenterology, Clinique Saint Joseph, Liège, Belgium ; (8) Department of Gastroenterology, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium ; (9) Department of Gastroenterology, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.

Background : The natural history of ulcerative colitis (UC) is unpredictable. Factors associated with the need for different types of step-up therapy in UC patients failing on 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or corticosteroids are understudied. Aims : Describe step-up therapy in patients with UC the first year after failing on 5-ASA or corticosteroids. Methods : A Belgian, multi-center, prospective, non-interven- tional observational study comprising adult UC patients failing on 5-ASA or corticosteroids and naïve to immunomodulators/ biologicals. During a 12 months follow-up, patient characteristics, demography, medical therapy, biomarkers, therapy adherence and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Results : After 1 year, 35% of the patients were on biological therapy. Use of anti-TNF differed depending on baseline treatment: corticosteroid-refractory patients (55.8%), 5-ASA refractory (20.0%), and corticosteroid-dependent (16.0%) patients (p<0.001). The decision to start a line of therapy was based on the Mayo combined severity but not on biomarkers like faecal calprotectin, haemoglobin, CRP, albumin, platelets, and number of extra- intestinal manifestations. At year 1, 84.2% of the patients had only mild UC or remission and a significant improvement of fatigue (p=0.004) and IBDQ scores (p<0.001) were observed implying an improved QoL. Conclusion : Treatment step-up, based on clinical scores in immunomodulatory and anti-TNF naïve patients with UC, provides good clinical outcomes and QoL. (Acta gastroenterol. belg., 2019, 82, 365-372).

© Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica.
PMID 31566323